On NoticeOn Notice
Parliament is not currently sitting. Showing the most recent sitting day. View sitting calendar →
House of RepsSenate

Thursday 13 August 2026

House of Representatives

AI Summary

The House of Representatives introduced ten bills on 13 August 2026, including a suite of five measures establishing a framework requiring digital platforms to pay Australian news organisations for content.

The House introduced ten bills on 13 August 2026. Five related bills established a news media bargaining framework: the News Journalism Payments Bill 2026, the News Journalism Payments (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2026, the News Media Bargaining (Administration) Bill 2026, the News Media Bargaining Charge Bill 2026, and the Treasury Laws Amendment (News Media Bargaining) (Consequential) Bill 2026, collectively requiring digital platforms to negotiate payments with news publishers and updating existing laws accordingly. Also introduced were the Biosecurity Amendment (Improving Operational Efficiency) Bill 2026, the Wine and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2026, the Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026, the National Self-exclusion Register (Cost Recovery Levy) Amendment Bill 2026, and the Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026. No divisions were held. During question time, Prime Minister Albanese was asked about comments made on the Bush Deep podcast and about remarks concerning the Japanese Prime Minister, deflecting both questions. The government was also questioned on real wage declines, declining home loan applications following tax changes, and the timeline for implementing science investment reforms from the Ambitious Australia report.

Question Time

Angus TaylorLIBGovernment Members

Prime Minister

AI Summary

Angus Taylor asked the Prime Minister to take responsibility for comments made on the Bush Deep podcast, accusing them of avoiding a straight answer and hiding behind the New South Wales Premier. The response consisted only of government members interjecting, with no substantive response from the Prime Minister recorded.

Zoe McKenzieLIBAnthony AlbaneseALP

Prime Minister

AI Summary

Member McKenzie asked Prime Minister Albanese why he would not take responsibility for sexist remarks made about the Japanese Prime Minister, given his previous public statement opposing disrespect toward women. The Prime Minister deflected by citing positive comments from the Japanese ambassador and describing the successful nature of the Japanese Prime Minister's visit, without directly addressing the criticism.

Kate ChaneyINDMichelle RowlandALP

Science

AI Summary

Kate Chaney asked when the government would commit to implementing the full package of reforms from the Ambitious Australia report to address Australia's declining science investment and STEM graduate rankings. Michelle Rowland responded that the report's reforms will take time to deliver, characterised the recent budget's $2 billion in new R&D spending as 'first steps' of the government's response, and outlined several initiatives including the National Resilience and Science Council and $1.5 billion in science and innovation investment, without committing to a full implementation timeline.

Tim WilsonLIBAnthony AlbaneseALP

Economy

AI Summary

Tim Wilson asked why the Albanese government is making Australians poorer, citing data showing workers are $1,200 a year worse off. Prime Minister Albanese deflected from the specific cost-of-living concern by listing various government policies aimed at easing cost-of-living pressures (tax cuts, bulk-billing improvements, TAFE funding, wage justice measures) and criticizing the opposition's record, without directly addressing the data or explaining the decline in real wages.

David BattLNPClare O'NeilALP

Housing

AI Summary

The member questioned whether Labor's tax changes caused a decline in home loan applications, but Minister O'Neil did not directly address the loan application figures. Instead, she defended the government's housing tax reforms as necessary to level the playing field between first-home buyers and investors, and emphasized the government's broader housing agenda.

Melissa PriceLIBAnthony AlbaneseALP

Taxation

AI Summary

Price asked about first home buyers in negative equity due to Labor's tax policies. Prime Minister Albanese deflected by criticizing the opposition's housing spokesperson and provided RBA data showing less than 1% of mortgage holders are in negative equity—less than half the rate under the previous Liberal government in 2017-2019.

Monique RyanINDAnthony AlbaneseALP

Gambling Advertising

AI Summary

Ryan asked whether it is appropriate for AFL and NRL to receive tens of millions in tax-free gambling revenue annually from a predatory industry. Albanese deflected from the tax question by highlighting his government's gambling advertising legislation, noting it will remove betting sponsorships from NRL club jumpers and stadium naming rights, causing clubs to lose revenue.

Henry PikeLNPMark ButlerALP

Private Health Insurance

AI Summary

Henry Pike questioned the Prime Minister about Labor's changes to private health insurance rebates, claiming they would cost elderly Australians an extra $1,000 annually. Mark Butler directly disputed the figure, stating the average impact would be $220-$250 per year, and explained the decision was necessary to fund aged-care services for Australia's aging population.

Elizabeth Watson-BrownGRNAnthony AlbaneseALP

Gambling Industry

AI Summary

The Prime Minister confirmed they have not met with gambling industry representatives since introducing gambling reform legislation. They responded directly to the question but then pivoted to defending their broader engagement approach with parliamentarians and rejecting criticism of sporting codes.